Re: reading...?

[John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>]

--On Thursday, 06 December, 2001 06:05 +0000
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

>> But, unless we can find terminology that really fits, I think
>> it might be better to force people to read documents and
>> definitions rather than looking at a word and guessing at the
>> mechanisms.

> Perhaps I am oversteping here but I find the current
> discussion less "green-field" than it might look at first
> glance.
> 
> Some documents that might be germaine:
> 
> 	SNS - Dagile & Melling

Part of the process, very actively so.

> 	Handle - Sun
> 	RC/BLOB - Moore

I'm unconvinced that either of these are relevant (at least if
"Handle" refers to what I think it does), but would be happy to
hear from one of the relevant authors to the contrary -- in
detail.

    john