[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-irnss Home]
Subject: Re: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer 2 (was: RE: "so -called" keyword and layer 3)
There are differences on a cell phone compared to a PC. There are more restriction on a cell phone than a PC, and therefore, an organization would have differnet content. But that is a second level detail, for example, differential IE browser, from Netscape, from i-mode browser, from j-phone browser, from GSM, from GPRS etc. But the bottomline, all of them are browsing. If we have an agreement that we need a second level of detail, then Yves might be right. Otherwise, I am incline to support Michael that all of them are just browsing. -James Seng ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yves Arrouye" <yves@realnames.com> To: "'Michael Mealling'" <michael@neonym.net> Cc: <ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:48 AM Subject: RE: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer 2 (was: RE: "so -called" keyword and layer 3) > > In my mind at least, the service type has more to do with what > > the user is attempting to do with the sls-name than what the registrant > > of the name wishes the user to do.... > > Browsing on a PC versus browsing on a cell phone are two very different > activities for the user. And many organizations have content for both > activities. I would like whatever we build to support that. > > YA >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-irnss Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC