ietf-nomcom

192 messages (listed by date, most recent first) | Thread Index | ietf-nomcom Home

  1. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 18:29:18 -0500 (EST)
  2. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Scott Brim <swb@employees.org> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 17:18:30 -0500 (EST)
  3. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 17:09:14 -0500 (EST)
  4. Re: DISCUSSION: rejecting candidates
    From "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 17:00:02 -0500 (EST)
  5. Re: DISCUSSION: rejecting candidates
    From Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 16:53:41 -0500 (EST)
  6. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 15:04:22 -0500 (EST)
  7. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:42:29 -0500 (EST)
  8. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Scott Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:35:01 -0500 (EST)
  9. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Scott Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:35:01 -0500 (EST)
  10. Re: SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:29:30 -0500 (EST)
  11. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From avri <avri@apocalypse.org> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 11:00:56 -0500 (EST)
  12. Re: SUMMARY: should there be term limits?
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:35:29 -0500 (EST)
  13. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:31:47 -0500 (EST)
  14. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:28:51 -0500 (EST)
  15. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 23:57:30 -0500 (EST)
  16. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Bob Hinden <hinden@IPRG.nokia.com> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 23:17:01 -0500 (EST)
  17. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 22:42:12 -0500 (EST)
  18. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 21:17:36 -0500 (EST)
  19. Re: What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 19:57:06 -0500 (EST)
  20. What is the problem [was Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?]
    From Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 17:41:10 -0500 (EST)
  21. Re: SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently
    From "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:22:05 -0500 (EST)
  22. Re: SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently
    From Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 12:49:26 -0500 (EST)
  23. Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 11:30:20 -0500 (EST)
  24. Re: A random sample of what?
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 10:34:10 -0500 (EST)
  25. A random sample of what? (was: Re: SUMMARY: should there be term limits?)
    From John C Klensin <john+nomcom@jck.com> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 10:00:20 -0500 (EST)
  26. A random sample of what? (was: Re: SUMMARY: should there be term limits?)
    From John C Klensin <john+nomcom@jck.com> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 08:23:35 -0500 (EST)
  27. Re: SUMMARY: should there be term limits?
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 05:17:38 -0500 (EST)
  28. Re: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 05:11:44 -0500 (EST)
  29. Re: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 05:11:25 -0500 (EST)
  30. Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 05:02:59 -0500 (EST)
  31. Re: SUMMARY: should there be term limits?
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:10:30 -0500 (EST)
  32. Re: SUMMARY: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From John C Klensin <john+nomcom@jck.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 23:50:28 -0500 (EST)
  33. Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From John C Klensin <john+nomcom@jck.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 23:49:53 -0500 (EST)
  34. Re: SUMMARY: should there be term limits?
    From Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 23:44:21 -0500 (EST)
  35. Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From John C Klensin <klensin+sonic@jck.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 23:25:01 -0500 (EST)
  36. Re: SUMMARY: should there be term limits?
    From "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 22:58:22 -0500 (EST)
  37. Re: SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 22:21:01 -0500 (EST)
  38. Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 22:15:11 -0500 (EST)
  39. Re: SUMMARY: should there be term limits?
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 22:12:33 -0500 (EST)
  40. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 21:57:47 -0500 (EST)
  41. Re: SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:07:17 -0500 (EST)
  42. Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 19:55:08 -0500 (EST)
  43. Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 19:49:00 -0500 (EST)
  44. RE: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Matt Holdrege <matt.holdrege@verizon.net> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 19:42:47 -0500 (EST)
  45. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 19:40:58 -0500 (EST)
  46. Re: SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 19:33:15 -0500 (EST)
  47. RE: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 19:32:40 -0500 (EST)
  48. Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 19:02:35 -0500 (EST)
  49. Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 18:35:05 -0500 (EST)
  50. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:55:02 -0500 (EST)
  51. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Matt Holdrege <matt.holdrege@verizon.net> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:40:56 -0500 (EST)
  52. Re: SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:24:12 -0500 (EST)
  53. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Matt Holdrege <matt.holdrege@verizon.net> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:17:42 -0500 (EST)
  54. Re: SUMMARY: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From John Morris <jmorris@cdt.org> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:11:21 -0500 (EST)
  55. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Bill Woodcock <woody@zocalo.net> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:05:48 -0500 (EST)
  56. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From John C Klensin <john+nomcom@jck.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 15:42:29 -0500 (EST)
  57. Re: SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently
    From Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 15:22:07 -0500 (EST)
  58. Re: SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently
    From Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:51:11 -0500 (EST)
  59. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Bill Woodcock <woody@zocalo.net> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:51:01 -0500 (EST)
  60. SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:16:40 -0500 (EST)
  61. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:05:01 -0500 (EST)
  62. Re: DISCUSSION: rejecting candidates
    From "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:59:59 -0500 (EST)
  63. Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:57:45 -0500 (EST)
  64. DISCUSSION: rejecting candidates
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:57:26 -0500 (EST)
  65. SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:55:15 -0500 (EST)
  66. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:44:29 -0500 (EST)
  67. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:37:43 -0500 (EST)
  68. Re: SUMMARY: should there be term limits?
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:28:17 -0500 (EST)
  69. SUMMARY: should there be term limits?
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:24:09 -0500 (EST)
  70. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From avri <avri@apocalypse.org> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:08:12 -0500 (EST)
  71. SUMMARY: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:57:05 -0500 (EST)
  72. AGENDA for NOMCOM
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:12:45 -0500 (EST)
  73. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com> on Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:15:01 -0500 (EST)
  74. Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:26:50 -0500 (EST)
  75. Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:33:16 -0500 (EST)
  76. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Bill Woodcock <woody@zocalo.net> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:04:54 -0500 (EST)
  77. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Matt Holdrege <matt.holdrege@verizon.net> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:14:09 -0500 (EST)
  78. RE: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From David Allan <dallan@nortelnetworks.com> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:13:26 -0500 (EST)
  79. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:06:39 -0500 (EST)
  80. Re: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:47:09 -0500 (EST)
  81. Re: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:24:39 -0500 (EST)
  82. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:15:04 -0500 (EST)
  83. Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:15:04 -0500 (EST)
  84. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:15:03 -0500 (EST)
  85. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 05:41:21 -0500 (EST)
  86. Re: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 05:31:54 -0500 (EST)
  87. Re: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 04:19:34 -0500 (EST)
  88. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 19:57:05 -0500 (EST)
  89. RE: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From Russ White <ruwhite@cisco.com> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 19:35:01 -0500 (EST)
  90. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Russ White <ruwhite@cisco.com> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 19:16:40 -0500 (EST)
  91. RE: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 17:08:45 -0500 (EST)
  92. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Matt Holdrege <matt.holdrege@verizon.net> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:39:53 -0500 (EST)
  93. RE: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From David Allan <dallan@nortelnetworks.com> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:20:44 -0500 (EST)
  94. Re: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:09:11 -0500 (EST)
  95. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 13:29:59 -0500 (EST)
  96. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 12:27:08 -0500 (EST)
  97. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:59:50 -0500 (EST)
  98. Re: DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From Russ White <ruwhite@cisco.com> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:45:04 -0500 (EST)
  99. DISCUSSION: publish list of nominees?
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:56:12 -0500 (EST)
  100. Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:14:27 -0500 (EST)
  101. What I was trying to say in the plenary last week
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 05:33:04 -0500 (EST)
  102. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Thu, 21 Mar 2002 11:05:12 -0500 (EST)
  103. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:51:44 -0500 (EST)
  104. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From avri <avri@sm.luth.se> on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 17:27:21 -0500 (EST)
  105. Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:30:16 -0500 (EST)
  106. Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 02:05:24 -0500 (EST)
  107. Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:01:21 -0500 (EST)
  108. Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From Scott Brim <swb@employees.org> on Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:05:08 -0500 (EST)
  109. Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From Marshall Rose <mrose+internet.ietf.nomcom@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:19:07 -0500 (EST)
  110. Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:22:54 -0500 (EST)
  111. Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Tue, 19 Mar 2002 06:00:06 -0500 (EST)
  112. Number of candidates [was Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?]
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:40:46 -0500 (EST)
  113. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From Mark Allman <mallman@grc.nasa.gov> on Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:55:03 -0500 (EST)
  114. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Mon, 18 Mar 2002 04:55:29 -0500 (EST)
  115. CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Sun, 17 Mar 2002 17:04:12 -0500 (EST)
  116. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Sun, 17 Mar 2002 14:58:13 -0500 (EST)
  117. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sun, 17 Mar 2002 13:55:02 -0500 (EST)
  118. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sun, 17 Mar 2002 13:14:33 -0500 (EST)
  119. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Sun, 17 Mar 2002 12:54:36 -0500 (EST)
  120. Re: DISCUSSION: TERM LIMITS - Was Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Sun, 17 Mar 2002 12:48:11 -0500 (EST)
  121. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Sun, 17 Mar 2002 12:44:47 -0500 (EST)
  122. Re: REOPENED DISCUSSION Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Sun, 17 Mar 2002 12:38:54 -0500 (EST)
  123. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sun, 17 Mar 2002 09:35:09 -0500 (EST)
  124. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 21:12:59 -0500 (EST)
  125. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 16:05:02 -0500 (EST)
  126. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 12:01:06 -0500 (EST)
  127. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 11:30:19 -0500 (EST)
  128. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From Mark Allman <mallman@grc.nasa.gov> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:35:03 -0500 (EST)
  129. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:35:02 -0500 (EST)
  130. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:35:02 -0500 (EST)
  131. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 04:17:13 -0500 (EST)
  132. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 04:07:01 -0500 (EST)
  133. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 03:56:23 -0500 (EST)
  134. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 03:55:42 -0500 (EST)
  135. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 03:51:03 -0500 (EST)
  136. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 03:48:59 -0500 (EST)
  137. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 03:22:46 -0500 (EST)
  138. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 03:17:32 -0500 (EST)
  139. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 03:05:54 -0500 (EST)
  140. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 02:19:58 -0500 (EST)
  141. Re: DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 02:18:10 -0500 (EST)
  142. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Sat, 16 Mar 2002 02:17:29 -0500 (EST)
  143. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:38:35 -0500 (EST)
  144. Re: DISCUSSION: TERM LIMITS - Was Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:29:35 -0500 (EST)
  145. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From Matt Holdrege <matt.holdrege@verizon.net> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:12:33 -0500 (EST)
  146. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From John Morris <jmorris@cdt.org> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:34:23 -0500 (EST)
  147. Re: DISCUSSION: TERM LIMITS - Was Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:25:05 -0500 (EST)
  148. Re: DISCUSSION: TERM LIMITS - Was Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:55:05 -0500 (EST)
  149. REOPENED DISCUSSION Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:55:04 -0500 (EST)
  150. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:45:03 -0500 (EST)
  151. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:35:43 -0500 (EST)
  152. Re: DISCUSSION: TERM LIMITS - Was Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:30:14 -0500 (EST)
  153. DISCUSSION: TERM LIMITS - Was Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:25:08 -0500 (EST)
  154. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:25:06 -0500 (EST)
  155. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:05:07 -0500 (EST)
  156. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:05:06 -0500 (EST)
  157. Re: DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:49:26 -0500 (EST)
  158. Re: DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:32:39 -0500 (EST)
  159. DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:22:06 -0500 (EST)
  160. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:45:02 -0500 (EST)
  161. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:45:01 -0500 (EST)
  162. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:00:21 -0500 (EST)
  163. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 07:47:39 -0500 (EST)
  164. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 05:29:23 -0500 (EST)
  165. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 04:58:25 -0500 (EST)
  166. Re: DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:43:50 -0500 (EST)
  167. DISCUSSION: should there be term limits?
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:26:06 -0500 (EST)
  168. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:25:05 -0500 (EST)
  169. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:25:04 -0500 (EST)
  170. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:25:03 -0500 (EST)
  171. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 19:20:55 -0500 (EST)
  172. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:56:09 -0500 (EST)
  173. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:15:48 -0500 (EST)
  174. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From James M Galvin <galvin@eListX.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:15:04 -0500 (EST)
  175. Re: DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:00:36 -0500 (EST)
  176. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:50:58 -0500 (EST)
  177. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:47:50 -0500 (EST)
  178. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:15:05 -0500 (EST)
  179. Re: DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:15:04 -0500 (EST)
  180. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:15:03 -0500 (EST)
  181. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:35:21 -0500 (EST)
  182. Re: DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:26:11 -0500 (EST)
  183. Re: DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:05:11 -0500 (EST)
  184. Re: DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:55:19 -0500 (EST)
  185. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:55:17 -0500 (EST)
  186. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:27:56 -0500 (EST)
  187. DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:26:33 -0500 (EST)
  188. Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> on Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:24:49 -0500 (EST)
  189. DISCUSSION: define the role of a liaison
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:14:56 -0500 (EST)
  190. Final Call: accept incorporated comments
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Wed, 13 Mar 2002 15:48:47 -0500 (EST)
  191. Re: Getting Started Again
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:44:43 -0500 (EST)
  192. Getting Started Again
    From James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> on Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:42:47 -0500 (EST)