Re: DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members

[James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>]

Your right, I should have caught that.  This document necessarily does
not comment on the organization of the IAB or the IESG, so it would be
wrong to suggest there exists a General Area.

I'll change it to be the IETF Chair, unless someone has a better
suggestion.

Jim



On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Robert Elz wrote:

    Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:46:38 +0700
    From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
    To: James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>
    Cc: ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com, poised@lists.tislabs.com
    Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members

        Date:        Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:27:32 -0500 (EST)
        From:        James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>
        Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.43.0203131620140.24968-100000@three.elistx.com>

      | I would propose we recognize the appointed Chair of the Nominating
      | Committee as the Working Group Chair and that the designated Area
      | Director should be from the General Area.

    Just make it explicitly be the IETF chair (which is de-facto the same
    thing, but avoids building in an assumption that there is a "general"
    area that has a chair - once upon a time we had a user services area...)

      | Comments or other suggestions?

    Aside from that, looks fine.

    kre


    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
    manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>