ietf-nomcom message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]


Subject: Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments


On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Robert Elz wrote:


      | > 7.  The Chair is responsible for ensuring all information
      | >        related to the selection and confirmation of candidates
      | >        is archived with the Internet Society President upon
      | >        completion of the nominating committee's
      | >        responsibilities.

    The rationale explains that this is just a codification of existing
    practice, if that's correct, I am appalled.

It is my recollection that this is necessary to legally protect all of
the NOMCOM participants, NOMCOM process, IETF, and ISOC.

Perhaps the situation has changed.  Can any past NOMCOM Chairs confirm
my recollection?

Assuming I'm not way off base I don't see a problem with asking the
IETF/ISOC counsel for a recommendation.  Of course I'd like to avoid an
"amateur lawyer" discussion if possible, so let's just get a
recommendation if that's what people want.

Is that what people want?


      | > 13.  A candidate may not be confirmed to serve for both an
      | >         IESG and an IAB position concurrently.

    The IETF chair is a member of both the IESG and the IAB.
    and ...

Yes, you could see it that way.  However, it's an ex officio role.  The
IETF Chair is a member of the IESG who serves on the IAB.  Does that
make him a member of the IAB?  I choose to say no.  If others disagree
with me I'll wordsmith to make an exception of the IETF Chair.
Otherwise I'll leave the text as is.


      | >         If the term of the sitting role does not end
      | >         coincident with the start of the term of the new role,
      | >         the confirmed candidate must choose exactly one role.

    What you have written isn't clear.  Nor do I think this is in the
    slightest bit important to anything (but better no language than
    ambiguous language).

Do I correctly understand that you agree in principle with the intent
and object only to its expression?  As long as that's true I'll
wordsmith for the next draft.


Thanks,

Jim



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC