Re: DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members

[James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>]

I don't see the judge and jury bug.  Can you say more about what you're
concerned about?

Jim



On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

    Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:25:03 +0100
    From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
    To: Robert Elz <kre@MUNNARI.OZ.AU>
    Cc: James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>,
         ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com, poised@lists.tislabs.com
    Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: disputes regarding selection of NOMCOM members

    I don't have context for this (off line in the airline system for a day)
    but it looks suspiciously like making the NomCom chair be judge and jury
    and that is a Bug.

       Brian

    Robert Elz wrote:
    >
    >     Date:        Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:27:32 -0500 (EST)
    >     From:        James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>
    >     Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.43.0203131620140.24968-100000@three.elistx.com>
    >
    >   | I would propose we recognize the appointed Chair of the Nominating
    >   | Committee as the Working Group Chair and that the designated Area
    >   | Director should be from the General Area.
    >
    > Just make it explicitly be the IETF chair (which is de-facto the same
    > thing, but avoids building in an assumption that there is a "general"
    > area that has a chair - once upon a time we had a user services area...)
    >
    >   | Comments or other suggestions?
    >
    > Aside from that, looks fine.
    >
    > kre

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
    manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>