DISCUSSION: archiving of NOMCOM information

[James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>]

Please use this message, or at least the Subject line of this message,
to continue the thread discussing the archiving of NOMCOM information.

Thanks,

Jim



On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Graham Klyne wrote:

    Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:14:51 +0000
    From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
    To: Robert Elz <kre@MUNNARI.OZ.AU>
    Cc: James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>,
         ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com, poised@lists.tislabs.com
    Subject: Re: Final Call: accept incorporated comments

    A thought on the archival of comments to NonCom:

    Would it be sufficient/acceptable to archive the comments without the
    identity of the person from whom they came?  (Or just a hash of the
    sender's email address, or... )  Possibly with an affirmation of a
    then-serving member of NonCom that the comments came from a participant in
    the IETF processes.

    Like specifications review, I would hope the _content_ of comments carries
    more weight than the identity of their author.

    #g


    -------------------
    Graham Klyne
    <GK@NineByNine.org>


    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
    manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>