Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> If this ends up being the consensus, I would request that revised
> document not be silent on this point, but there be an explicit note
> that it is the sense of the community that there should not be term
> limits, and that the primary criteria to be used by the nomcom is
> whether or not the incumbent is continueing to do a good job.  If an
> incumbent has become ossified, and is doing a bad job --- then sure,
> remove him.  

the current words are subtle, but i think a bit better

from 2727 2(1)

   (1)  The principal functions of the nominating committee are to
        review the open IESG and IAB positions and to either nominate
        its incumbent or recruit a superior candidate.
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
randy