Re: CONSENSUS: should there be term limits?

[Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>]

>
>the current words are subtle, but i think a bit better
>
>from 2727 2(1)
>
>   (1)  The principal functions of the nominating committee are to
>        review the open IESG and IAB positions and to either nominate
>        its incumbent or recruit a superior candidate.
>                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


These words encompass all that I have heard regarding incumbents and issue of term limits. The essential message of this section is the concept of regular peer review and comparison to the current needs of the position to the attributes of the incumbent. If there are individual(s) who, at the time, can offer superior capabilities then this section is clear - pick them and use their  skills. If not, then continue to use the skills of the incumbent on the basis that the Nomcom can find noone better.