Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> I disagree with this summary.
> 
> Firstly, you omitted an argument that publishing such a list would increase 
> the likelihood of organized public campaigning for positions. you also 
> omitted the argument that such actions would do nothing to increase the 
> level of confidence in the Nomcom performing its duties diligently.
> 
> Secondly, I fail to see how 4 in favour and 2 against can be summarized as 
> a "consensus". It is not consensus, it is the view of 4 posters, while 2 
> posters dissented. That's not consensus.
> 
> Thirdly, I echo concerns by others that the preemptory posting of such 
> ex-cathedra pronouncements of "proposed consensus" within a few days of a 
> topic being opened is not normally interpreted as responsible chairing of a 
> working group. Indeed, one could interpret such actions as being quite the 
> opposite. I fail to understand how you interpret this discussion as having 
> reached "consensus" at this point in time.

what he said.

this process itself is broken.

randy