ietf-nomcom message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]


Subject: Re: What I was trying to say in the plenary last week


> SPEAKING AS EDITOR:
> 
> Avri has made the suggestion that we reinforce the fact that a
> confirming body can so "no" to one or more candidates in a slate by
> preventing the NOMCOM from resubmitting a rejected candidate during that
> NOMCOM's term.  You can read her argument in favor of this below.
> 
> Please reply to this message or at least use the subject line of this
> message in your reply when responding to the suggestion.

jim - i strongly disagree with this suggestion, as it misses the whole points of checks and balances. rather than explain why here, please see my next message which places this and several issues into a larger context. (sorry about not following your request re: the subject line...)

/mtr


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC