Re: SUMMARY: serving on both IAB and IESG concurrently

[Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>]

Howdy,

Personally, I'm in favour of not making any changes unless and
until the _problem_ has been clearly understood.  

We don't need to tie ourselves in knots with extraneous process
rules that will only trip us up when unforeseen circumstances
arise.

If there is a problem, let's discuss, solve and document it.  Otherwise, 
let's drop it.

Leslie.

James M Galvin wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Thomas Narten wrote:
> 
>     Remind me please. What problem is this fixing?
> 
> None specifically.  I have a note from some number of NOMCOM's ago that
> this was an issue they would have liked clarification about.  I believed
> it was the intent of the document and so I incorporated the change
> directly considering it a clarification.
> 
>     Note: I would expect that no one would be so foolish as to want to do
>     this, and I wouldn't expect the nomcom to think this is a good
>     idea. But do we need an explicit rule forbidding it?
> 
> It was requested.  This group can certainly decide otherwise.
> 
> Jim
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
"An essential element of a successful journey
    is recognizing when you have arrived."
   -- ThinkingCat

Leslie Daigle
leslie@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------