Re: SUMMARY: publish list of nominees?

[Geoff Huston <gih@kahuna.telstra.net>]

> 
> Geoff Huston wrote:
> ...
> > 
> > (If it isn't obvious, I'm of the view that the confirming bodies are in the
> > process for a good purpose, and a rejection of a nomination by a confirming
> > body should compel the Nomcom to  review its own process of consultation
> > and understand why it had reached a different conclusion than the
> > confirming body, and then work to reconcile the differing perspectives
> > between the nomcom and the confirming body)
> 
> Absolutely. That's why I'm quite attracted by Ted's idea of stretching the
> timescale, to give time for this process to occur without entering panic
> mode. Regardless of whether we end up publishing the list, I think this is
> desirable.

I too can see merit in allowing the confirming bodies some time to
undertake their roles with care and attention, and if that implies
stretching the timescale, that may be an acceptable means to allow for
this.

Geoff