Re: DISCUSSION: rejecting candidates

[Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

--On torsdag, april 18, 2002 11:56:19 -0700 Bill Woodcock 
<woody@zocalo.net> wrote:

> As you say, the problem is that the confirming body always considers its
> whim to constitute "critical information" as in your scenario 1, whereas
> the Nomcom might be quite reasonably suspicious that whims might be
> better categorized under scenario 3.

And (IMHO) the only way to figure out which scenario is which is sharing 
your information and talking about it before making a decision.

Which Brian's 6 weeks will allow.

The point being - all the scenarios *might* occur. So we can't base the 
rules on only one of them occuring.

                   Harald