Re: Possible extra "oral tradition" fordraft-ietf-nomcom-rfc2727bis-01.txt

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

Matt,

...
> But the nomcom will have already solicited input from as many 
> people as it sees fit. Getting more input is either redundant or it comes 
> from sources that the nomcom doesn't necessarily trust.

But this is exactly the point. If the confirming body is worrying whether
NomCom has listened to everybody that they needed to, we are in the space
where what the NomCom "sees fit" and deciding that more input is
"redundant" are exactly the points at issue. 

   Brian