ietf-nomcom message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]


Subject: Re:


> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 08:55:53AM -0700, Marshall Rose allegedly wrote:
> > i'm going to suggest the opposite. perhaps we should change it to:
> > 
> > > "Members of the IETF community must have registered for at
> > > least 2 of the last 3 IETF meetings in order to volunteer."

> If you want to be explicit, what about people who register and just show
> up for a single session?  If they're excluded, how about those who come
> for just one day?  IMHO leave it at the original suggestion, it's close
> enough (very), doesn't confuse anyone, and doesn't get into nitpicking.

scott - my point is that if you leave out "and attended" then there is no ambiguity. when you add "and attended" you introduce ambiguity.

/mtr


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC