[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]
Subject: Re:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 08:55:53AM -0700, Marshall Rose allegedly wrote: > > i'm going to suggest the opposite. perhaps we should change it to: > > > > > "Members of the IETF community must have registered for at > > > least 2 of the last 3 IETF meetings in order to volunteer." > If you want to be explicit, what about people who register and just show > up for a single session? If they're excluded, how about those who come > for just one day? IMHO leave it at the original suggestion, it's close > enough (very), doesn't confuse anyone, and doesn't get into nitpicking. scott - my point is that if you leave out "and attended" then there is no ambiguity. when you add "and attended" you introduce ambiguity. /mtr
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC