[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]
Subject: RE: guidance on avoiding too many people from one company/group
Trust is an enormous burden and should not be imposed unnecessarily. When I first pushed the algorithm now described in RFC 2777, many people posted messages saying I was being ridiculous, that the nomcom chair had to be totally trusted so there was no reason to provide publicly verifiable fair selection of nomcom members, etc., etc. But every former nomcom chair who expressed an opinion (including myself) favored that change and wished to be relieved of the burden of trust in this case. I would also note that the nomcom operates in private but the selection and this volunteering to decline selection are public. If a nomcom member were to be under pressure to do something for their employer in the nomcom, the confidentiality of operation protects them. No so with declining selection. What if it would cause them to lose a standards participation bonus? For example, my current employer, Motorola has a four tiered scale of annual bonuses for standards participation. Are you sure that if "we simply ask", people will decline when it might effect their pocket book? While the nomcom system would not work without a sufficient amount of trust, in this case I certainly want a mandatory rule. Thanks, Donald On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Christian Huitema wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:12:51 -0800 > From: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com> > To: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, > ietf-nomcom <ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com> > Subject: RE: guidance on avoiding too many people from one company/group > > > Or, from another point of view, you can consider the string comparison > > on the affiliations, as posted, to be part of the algorithm. > > The system, to a large extent, is based on trust. We trust nomcom > volunteers to exercise their best judgment and select the next batch of > area directors and IAB members. So, I suggest that we simply ask > selected nomcom members to decline selection if there are already two > members selected with the same affiliation. In the case they would not, > we have checks, e.g. publication of the nomcom member list to the IETF, > approval of the selections by IAB & ISOC. > > -- Christian Huitema ====================================================================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd dee3@torque.pothole.com 155 Beaver Street +1-508-634-2066(h) +1-508-851-8280(w) Milford, MA 01757 USA Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC