RE: Update

[Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>]

I also favor the 3 out of 5 rule.

As the IETF grows larger and more diffuse, the socialization and
learning time it takes for attendees to absorb the Tao of the IETF, on
the average, grows. I believe a 3 out of 5 rules is needed to merely
assure the same level of nomcom committee member we had 9 years ago with
a 2 out of 3 rule then.

Thanks,
Donald
======================================================================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd                       dee3@torque.pothole.com
 155 Beaver Street              +1-508-634-2066(h) +1-508-851-8280(w)
 Milford, MA 01757 USA                   Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Putzolu, David wrote:

> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:55:24 -0800
> From: "Putzolu, David" <david.putzolu@intel.com>
> To: 'Avri Doria' <avri@acm.org>, ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com
> Subject: RE: Update
> 
> > It would be good for anyone who has an opinion on changing
> > the 2 out of 3 rule to a 3 out of 5 rule to let the list
> > know their opinion.
> 
> Hi Avri.
> 
> I am in favor of the 3/5 rule because I think it will result
> in a nomcom pool that has on average greater IETF experience.
> I also support the rule because it enables consistent contributors
> who happen to miss two IETFs in a three IETF period to still be
> represented in the nomcom.
> 
> I am assuming the secretariat has or the necessary records available
> to support a 3/5 rule - has that been verified?
> 
> Cheers,
> David Putzolu
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>
>