Re: Update

[Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>]

Thank you - the difference of 29 does not strike me as being
a major issue one way or the othjer, but on the side of
inclusiveness I would favour the 3/5 recommendation.

Geoff


At 11:41 PM 1/21/2003 -0500, avri doria wrote:

> Geoff Huston wrote:
> > On the 2/3 and 3/5 rule, it would be interesting to learn the numbers of 
> > individuals who would qualify under each criteria. It may be that the 
> > actual numbers are not so very different - or  not.
> > Is the data around, or could/should we request it from the Secretariat?
> >    Geoff
>
> From an Earlier message from Harald:
>
> > Numbers available for your benefit.
> >           Harlad
> > ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
> > Date: tirsdag, november 26, 2002 10:54:17 -0500
> > From: Steve Coya <scoya@ietf.org>
> > To: harald@alvestrand.no
> > Subject: Re: [iesg-secretary #4341] Estimating size of volunteer pool for 
> > nomcom
> > Your request #4341 was resolved by scoya:
> > Hi Harald,
> > Under the "2 out of last 3" rule, there were 1218 eligible
> > Under the "3 out of the last 5", there were 1189 eligible
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>