Re: Update

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

I concur
   Brian

Geoff Huston wrote:
> 
> Thank you - the difference of 29 does not strike me as being
> a major issue one way or the othjer, but on the side of
> inclusiveness I would favour the 3/5 recommendation.
> 
> Geoff
> 
> At 11:41 PM 1/21/2003 -0500, avri doria wrote:
> 
> >Geoff Huston wrote:
> >>On the 2/3 and 3/5 rule, it would be interesting to learn the numbers of
> >>individuals who would qualify under each criteria. It may be that the
> >>actual numbers are not so very different - or  not.
> >>Is the data around, or could/should we request it from the Secretariat?
> >>    Geoff
> >
> > From an Earlier message from Harald:
> >
> >>Numbers available for your benefit.
> >>           Harlad
> >>---------- Forwarded Message ----------
> >>Date: tirsdag, november 26, 2002 10:54:17 -0500
> >>From: Steve Coya <scoya@ietf.org>
> >>To: harald@alvestrand.no
> >>Subject: Re: [iesg-secretary #4341] Estimating size of volunteer pool for
> >>nomcom
> >>Your request #4341 was resolved by scoya:
> >>Hi Harald,
> >>Under the "2 out of last 3" rule, there were 1218 eligible
> >>Under the "3 out of the last 5", there were 1189 eligible