IETF56 Meeting slot for Nomcom WG

[Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>]

Hi,

Shortly, draft-ietf-nomcom-rfc2727bis-03.txt will be
available on the ID sites.  I think it covers the
remaining issues.

>  1.  The "superior candidate" definition was moved to be with its one
       and only use in the document.

>  2.  The eligibility qualifications for the nominating committee was
       changed to require attendance at 3 out of 5 of the last five
       meetings, to require volunteers to submit identifying contact
       information, and to request that volunteers be familiar with IETF
       processes and procedures.

>  3.  The method used to select volunteers is now required to produce
       an ordered list of volunteers.

>  4.  The process for selecting the 10 voting volunteers had several
       clarifications and additional requirements added, including a
       challenge process and the requirement to disallow more than two
       volunteers with the same primary affiliation.

>  5.  The process for recalling a sitting member of the IAB and IESG
       now requires at least 20 eligible members of the IETF community to
       sign a petition requesting the recall.


I have not yet requested a meeting slot for SF.
Partially because the current draft was not ready
until now, partly because I did not think there
were any open issues that needed to be discussed and
partly because the list has been very quiet of late.
I am hoping, in fact that this version of the draft
is ready for WG last call.

I do have a few hours left for requesting a meeting
slot.  If anyone has an agenda item that they believe
needs a meeting slot, please speak up immediately.

Apologies for waiting until the last minute to make
this request.

a.