Re: Should a CB approve a slate or individuals?

[Michael StJohns <mstjohns@mindspring.com>]

At 09:52 PM 3/31/2003 -0500, Avri Doria wrote:
> Michael StJohns wrote:
>
> As for RFC2727, I think it was ambiguous on the notion of a slate
> of candidates versus single candidates.


2727 was explicitly non-ambiguous.  Applicable language was:

 c. The sitting IAB members review the IESG candidates, consenting to

      some, all, or none.

      If all of the candidates are confirmed, the job of the nominating

      committee with respect to reviewing the open IESG positions is

      considered complete.  If some or none of the candidates are

      confirmed, the nominating committee must reconvene to select

      alternate candidates for the rejected candidates.  Any additional

      time required by the nominating committee should not exceed its

      maximum time allotment.