Re: Should the NomCom rules define CB voting behavior

[Michael StJohns <mstjohns@mindspring.com>]

At 10:01 PM 3/31/2003 -0500, Avri Doria wrote:

> Michael StJohns wrote:
>
> > At 05:05 PM 3/31/2003 -0500, Avri Doria wrote:
> >
> >> Re. The rules under which the CB decides to accept or not
> >> accept a slate. I.e. should 2727bis require a majority.
> >>
> >> It is the recommendation of the DT that it is not in the
> NomCom's
> >> purview to decide how the CB makes it decisions.  The
> recommendation
> >> is that 2727bis remove the requirement that at least 1/2 the
> CB
> >> approve a slate.  NomCom rules are for the NomCom, not the
> CBs, they
> >> make their decisions by whatever process their charters or
> practice
> >> dictate.
> >
> >
> > Again, please don't leave this in the hands of the CB.  The
> process at
> > which the CB reaches a majority can safely be left there, but, if
> this
> > is not externally specified, its not a given that the CB will
> establish
> > rules to deal with the edge cases.
> >

Sorry, above should have read "...establish rules to deal with edge
cases prior to encountering such edge cases."

> > Please specify at least the
> minimum required to let the CBs come to a
> > conclusion.
> >
>
> discussion?
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager:
> <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>