Re: Should the NomCom rules define CB voting behavior

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

I agree. The text in draft-ietf-nomcom-rfc2727bis-03.txt is
fine the way it is. The DT has no input from WG discussion to
justify a change.

   Brian

Scott Bradner wrote:
> 
> I disagree with the DT -
> I think it is in the IETF's scope to say that the CB has to have majority
> support and say what that majority is of (those voiting or those
> able to vote - I'd rather the latter)
> 
> specfically, I think it is in the IETF's scope to say how serious the
> CB needs to be - implying that if one person says "yes" and no one
> else says anything a set of nominees gets OKed (or not OKed) is
> not serious enough in my book
> 
> Scott