Re: deadlock problem

[Igor Faynberg <faynberg@bell-labs.com>]

Ran,

Absolutely, I concur with you and Scott.

Igor

RJ Atkinson wrote:
> 
> Igor,
> 
> Of course, I have no objection to fixing the grammar (or spelling,
> if I made an error there :-).
> 
> Does this mean you concur with Scott (and me) that the WG
> should adopt Proposal A ?
> 
> Ran
> 
> On Monday, May 12, 2003, at 16:27 America/Montreal, Igor Faynberg wrote:
> > I propose a nit in-line (because there is only one confirming body in
> > each
> > specific case)
> >
> > Igor
> >
> > Scott Bradner wrote:
> >>
> >> I like A
> >>
> >> (Proposal A)
> >>      For a given nominee to be confirmed, at least one-half of the
> >> sitting members of the confirming
> >
> >> bodies
> >
> > Change to "body"
> >
> >> must agree to confirm that nominee.
> >>      Nominees that are not confirmed under this rule are considered
> >> to be
> >>      rejected.
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> >> manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>