Re: Question 1 about deadlock issue

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

--On 15. mai 2003 09:37 -0400 James M Galvin 
<galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com> wrote:

> The problem with the default being reject is it sets aside 2 months of
> hard work of the NOMCOM for 2 weeks of the CB being unable to agree.
>
> I'm okay with the CB rejecting a candidate I just want them to actually
> do it.  I am not okay with the CB having the option to step aside and
> leave the NOMCOM wondering what happened and what to do next.

would you be happy if the "defaulting" rule required the CB to hold an 
explicit vote before the end of the timeout?

I read option A's "otherwise it is rejected" as describing the case in 
which there was no majority, not as describing a case where no vote was 
taken.

               Harald