Re: Alternative (H)

[RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>]

On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 11:12 America/Montreal, Christian Huitema 
wrote:
> This text has the advantage of not conflicting with ISOC's by-laws,
> which is good. However, the algorithm as presented does not completely
> resolve the deadlock problem. As proposed, the phrase "failing which 
> the
> candidate is considered to be rejected" seem to only apply to the case
> where the CB has no defined decision rule and resorts to majority
> voting.

In which way does (H) not solve the deadlock problem ?

Do mean that (H) does not solve the deadlock problem in the
case that the CB has a voting process that can deadlock ?

Or do you mean something else ?

Thanks,

Ran