Re: Current version?

[James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>]

Speaking as editor, when you have a standing document it is not
necessarily about opposing opinions.  The question is whether there is
consensus (overwhelming or compelling) to change the existing document.

Jim



On Thu, 22 May 2003, RJ Atkinson wrote:

    Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 16:13:13 -0400
    From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
    To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@mindspring.com>
    Cc: James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>,
         ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com
    Subject: Re: Current version?


    On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 14:43 America/Montreal, Michael StJohns
    wrote:
    > I love the passive voice - it hides a host of ills...
    >
    > Who determined?  As near as I remember, Brian and I had the
    > discussion, came to a consensus, and there were no opposing opinions.
    >
    > Mike

    And the person who made that determination please point to the specific
    list postings in the archive that indicated an opposing consensus ?

    Thanks,

    Ran




    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
    manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>