Liaisons interoperation with NOMCOM members

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

In the current document it is not clear totally to me that the Liaisons
should play a more limited role than currently stated, and this should
be the case.  The IAB and IESG Liaisons should only be present during
NOMCOM deliberations when requested and should not be part of the NOMCOM
discourse, unless they are required for clarfication as Liaisons.
Having the Liaisons in the room with the NOMCOM is like having the
Government with you in the voting booth, which is not good.

Thoughts?

Regards,
/jim