Re: Current version?

[RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>]

I support Brian and Mike, both in analysis of the problem and in
their proposed fix.

Regardless of how this item was lost/side-tracked last go around,
it needs to get pulled back from never-never-land and added to the
"Editor should change text" item list.

IMHO,

Ran


On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 09:00 America/Montreal, Brian E Carpenter 
wrote:

> Mike St J certainly convinced me that the text needed to be changed.
> Just to refresh the argument, "consult" suggests a level of 
> interdependency
> that isn't compatible either with the confirming body's independent
> role or with the strict confidentiality of the Nomcom's discussions.
> My proposed text describes fairly accurately what has actually
> happened in my experience (8 years on one of the confirming bodies,
> and 3 years on the other).
>
> Given that nobody disagreed with Mike and I on the list, once we
> reached agreement, I would certainly challenge the statement that
> there is no consensus for the change.
>
>    Brian