Re: Alternative (H2)

[James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>]

This is good for me.

Jim



On Fri, 23 May 2003, RJ Atkinson wrote:

    Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 09:19:47 -0400
    From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
    To: ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com
    Subject: Alternative (H2)


    Trying to combine Harald's proposal, Jim's draft amendment, and
    Christian's
    draft amendment, I come up with this.   It includes some wordsmithing
    edits by me, not intended to change the meaning.

    Would the folks who like (A2) be comfortable dropping that in favour
    of this ?  I am comfortable either with (A2) or the (H2) below.

    Is Harald OK with this ?

    Other comments ?

    Thanks,

    Ran Atkinson
    rja@extremenetworks.com

    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Delete the existing text in section 4, and replace with this:

         4. The confirming body decides whether it confirms each candidate
            using a confirmation decision rule chosen by the confirming body.

            If a confirming body has no specific confirmation decision rule,
            then confirming a given candidate should require at least
    one-half
            of the Confirming Body's sitting members to agree to that
            confirmation.

            The decision may be made by conducting a formal vote, by
    asserting
            consensus based on informal exchanges (e.g. email), or by any
            other mechanism that is used to conduct the normal business
            of the confirming body.

            Regardless of which decision rule the confirming body uses, any
            candidate that is not confirmed under that rule must be rejected.

            The confirming body must make its decision within a reasonable
            timeframe.   The results from the confirming body must be
    reported
            promptly to the nominating committee.