Re: Alternative (H2)

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

This is fine
   Brian

RJ Atkinson wrote:
> 
> Trying to combine Harald's proposal, Jim's draft amendment, and
> Christian's
> draft amendment, I come up with this.   It includes some wordsmithing
> edits by me, not intended to change the meaning.
> 
> Would the folks who like (A2) be comfortable dropping that in favour
> of this ?  I am comfortable either with (A2) or the (H2) below.
> 
> Is Harald OK with this ?
> 
> Other comments ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ran Atkinson
> rja@extremenetworks.com
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Delete the existing text in section 4, and replace with this:
> 
>      4. The confirming body decides whether it confirms each candidate
>         using a confirmation decision rule chosen by the confirming body.
> 
>         If a confirming body has no specific confirmation decision rule,
>         then confirming a given candidate should require at least
> one-half
>         of the Confirming Body's sitting members to agree to that
>         confirmation.
> 
>         The decision may be made by conducting a formal vote, by
> asserting
>         consensus based on informal exchanges (e.g. email), or by any
>         other mechanism that is used to conduct the normal business
>         of the confirming body.
> 
>         Regardless of which decision rule the confirming body uses, any
>         candidate that is not confirmed under that rule must be rejected.
> 
>         The confirming body must make its decision within a reasonable
>         timeframe.   The results from the confirming body must be
> reported
>         promptly to the nominating committee.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>