Re: Current version?

[Michael StJohns <mstjohns@mindspring.com>]

Would the chair please wake up and comment on this thread.


At 09:13 5/23/2003, RJ Atkinson wrote:


> I support Brian and Mike, both in analysis of the problem and in
> their proposed fix.
>
> Regardless of how this item was lost/side-tracked last go around,
> it needs to get pulled back from never-never-land and added to the
> "Editor should change text" item list.
>
> IMHO,
>
> Ran
>
>
> On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 09:00 America/Montreal, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> > Mike St J certainly convinced me that the text needed to be changed.
> > Just to refresh the argument, "consult" suggests a level of interdependency
> > that isn't compatible either with the confirming body's independent
> > role or with the strict confidentiality of the Nomcom's discussions.
> > My proposed text describes fairly accurately what has actually
> > happened in my experience (8 years on one of the confirming bodies,
> > and 3 years on the other).
> >
> > Given that nobody disagreed with Mike and I on the list, once we
> > reached agreement, I would certainly challenge the statement that
> > there is no consensus for the change.
> >
> >    Brian
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>