[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]
Subject: Re: H2 or J
I prefer H2 both on structure and substance.With regard to "reasonable time", we can live with the current text. If we want to tighten it up, it will have to specify a pretty short time period (2 or 3 weeks). Stating a time period, but making it long (4 weeks or longer) is a recipe for trouble.
Yours, Joel M. Halpern At 01:31 PM 6/5/2003 +0200, Avri Doria wrote:
Subject: H2 or J To: ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com To the working group. We currently have 2 suggestions that, I believe, express two different solutions and sets of opinions. I would like to hear opinions from the WG on preferences to see if there is rough consensus on one view or the other. I have included the 2 sections of suggested text below. I have one other question I want to direct to the group. both sets of text refer to the CB making decisions within a reasonable time. Is this sufficient? Or would a more precise definition of the time limit be needed. Thanks a.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC