Re: Liaisons interoperation with NOMCOM members

[RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>]

I prefer (a).
I do not object to (b) or (c).

Ran
rja@extremenetworks.com


On Sunday, Jun 8, 2003, at 23:04 America/Montreal, Avri Doria wrote:
> Having read through this thread carefully, I am not sure I see where
> the consensus is falling yet.
>
> If I read correctly I see several positions:
>
> a. Do nothing. The provisions in the current document are sufficient
> to allow the Nomcom to deal with a liaison who misbehaving or with
> any conflict of interest that may arise.
>
> b. add the following as suggested by Jim:
>
>    Liaisons and advisors (except the past Chair) may be requested
>     to temporarily leave a discussion at the Chair's discretion.
>
> b. add the following which is a rewording of Jim's suggestion:
>
>    Liaisons and advisors (except the past Chair) may be requested
>     to temporarily leave a discussion by a majority of the voting
>      members of the NomCom.
>
>    (no one suggested this wording but something like it seems
>     to be suggested by some of the comments.  Instead of majority,
>     implying a vote, the condition could be one of consensus. )
>
> As is often the case on this list, too few people have spoken up
> on the issue.  I would like to resolve this issue by the end of
> the week.