Re: H2 or J

[Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>]

    Date:        Mon, 09 Jun 2003 08:36:11 -0700
    From:        Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
    Message-ID:  
		 <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA03980379@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>

  | I prefer H2. Well, in fact, I like the concise wording of J, but I
  | prefer the outcome of H2, i.e., a candidate not explicitly confirmed or
  | rejected is *rejected*.

Actually, we should make it clear here that either H2 or J could be
worded so the default action is accept or reject.   Please don't allow
that difference between them as written to influence things.   If the
form of J is what is preferred, but "default reject" is the desired
outcome, then "confirmed" in J can easily become "rejected" (when I
first wrote it I said "PQRSed" because I didn't much care which way
it went - since then I have come to prefer "confirmed" but I still
don't care that much either way on that part).

kre