Re: H2 or J

[James M Galvin <galvin+ietf-nomcom@eListX.com>]

So, Step 4 in Rule 7 in Section 3 General, has been changed to the text
indicated with one minor editorial change that seems to have gotten lost
along the way:

  In the 4th paragraph change:

    must be rejected

  to be:

    is considered to be rejected

Jim



On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, avri wrote:

    Well though fewer then 10 people have spoken up, i believe
    there is a rough consensus for H2.

    > The confirming body decides whether it confirms each
    > candidate using a confirmation decision rule chosen
    > by the confirming body.
    >
    > If a confirming body has no specific confirmation
    > decision rule, then confirming a given candidate
    > should require at least one-half of the Confirming
    > Body's sitting members to agree to that confirmation.
    >
    > The decision may be made by conducting a formal vote,
    > by asserting consensus based on informal exchanges
    > (e.g. email), or by any other mechanism that is
    > conduct the normal business of the confirming body.
    >
    > Regardless of which decision rule the confirming body
    > uses, any candidate that is not confirmed under that
    > rule must be rejected.
    >
    > The confirming body must make its decision within a
    > reasonable timeframe.   The results from the confirming
    > body must be reported promptly to the nominating committee.