Re: One more comments on the process draft

[Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>]

> How important is this?
> We NEED this document ASAP.

I did apologize for being late, didn¹t I :-)

> Making a change like this is something I would like time to think about.
> Can we defer this to the next rev?  Please?

Your choice. I can resend the same msg when the draft comes out for IETF
last call, if it is too late for this group.

Lixia

> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> At 11:19 AM 7/16/2003 -0400, Scott Bradner wrote:
> 
>> fwiw - I think that this is a better concept than the N out of M by
>> itself - I might tweak the numbers (3 out of 7 with the one at least
>> 7 meetings ago) but I think this formulation would better ensure
>> that nomcom members understood the IETF they would be selecting leaders for.
>> 
>> Scott
>> 
>> ------
>> So how about the following as a suggestion:
>> 
>>    15.  in order to volunteer, Members of the IETF community must
>>         have attended at least 4 of the last 8 IETF meetings and the first
>>         attendance must be at least 3 years prior to the date on which the
>>         solicitation for nominating
>>         committee volunteers was submitted for distribution to the IETF
>>         community.
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>> manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>