Re: One more comments on the process draft

[Michael StJohns <mstjohns@mindspring.com>]

Actually, unless someone is about to leave the IAB or IESG, we actually 
don't need this until the new Nomcom is ready to be selected.  Let's get it 
right, rather than focusing on getting it now.

Mike



At 11:34 7/16/2003, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> How important is this?
> We NEED this document ASAP.
> Making a change like this is something I would like time to think about.
> Can we defer this to the next rev?  Please?
> Yours,
> Joel
>
> At 11:19 AM 7/16/2003 -0400, Scott Bradner wrote:
>
> > fwiw - I think that this is a better concept than the N out of M by
> > itself - I might tweak the numbers (3 out of 7 with the one at least
> > 7 meetings ago) but I think this formulation would better ensure
> > that nomcom members understood the IETF they would be selecting leaders for.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > ------
> > So how about the following as a suggestion:
> >
> >    15.  in order to volunteer, Members of the IETF community must
> >         have attended at least 4 of the last 8 IETF meetings and the first
> >         attendance must be at least 3 years prior to the date on which the
> >         solicitation for nominating
> >         committee volunteers was submitted for distribution to the IETF
> >         community.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>