Re: IESG Issue 7

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

--On 8. oktober 2003 08:56 -0400 Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu> wrote:

> > Questions:
> >
> > Is a change to the text required to make the two situation consistent?
>
> why not just make a blanket statement that the recall & nomcom committiees
> work the same way?

this was the difference between a recalled nomcom member and a resigned 
nomcom member, not between the recall & nomcom comittees.

Reproducing Avri's text:


> IESG Issue 7
> -----------------
>
>
> > Thomas Narten:
> >
> > If a voting volunteer member is recalled the committee may
> > >        choose to proceed with only 9 voting volunteers at its own
> > >        discretion.  In all other cases the Chair must repeat the
> > > random
> > >        selection process including an announcement of the iteration
> >
> > >        prior to the actual selection as stated elsewhere in this
> > >        document.
> >
> > The above implies to me that the nomcome is required to find a
> > replacement for a resignation, but is not for a recall. Shouldn't the
> > nomcom be allowed to also not replace resignations? I.e, I assume that
> > the nomcom would have  the option of filling or not filling any nomcom
> > opening, regardless of how it occurs.
>
> Questions:
>
> Is a change to the text required to make the two situation consistent?