Re: Issue: Transition rules?

[Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>]

> Hence there is no visible good reason
> to try to short-circuit that step.

just to be very clear - I did not intend to suggest that the ISOC BoT
step be "short-circuited".

I just point out, as Harald did, that the ISOC board step is to 
accept the IETF process -- so by simple English the process would
have to be already current before the ISOC BoT could accept it as
current


Scott