Re: Issue: Transition rules?

[RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>]

On Monday, Oct 13, 2003, at 14:03 America/Montreal, Scott Bradner wrote:
> I just point out, as Harald did, that the ISOC board step is to
> accept the IETF process -- so by simple English the process would
> have to be already current before the ISOC BoT could accept it as
> current

Nice twisting of words on your part since it is hardly "by simple 
English"
to go from "IESG and ISOC BOT must approve before changes take
effect" to "IESG only must approve before changes take effect".

Bottom line is that we disagree.  I still believe the new rules
cannot take effect until after ISOC BOT has formally approved them,
in addition to the IESG.

Probably not worth a lot more back and forth on this list,
since I think both views have been clearly put forward now.

Yours,

Ran