[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]
Subject: RE: Proposals for closing open issues
Hi All, The proposed solutions would satisfy my blocking issues, except for one remaining question: > "Nomcom-caused Mid-term Vacancies: > > From time to time the Nomcom may propose moving a serving Area > Director or IAB member from one position to another. (E.g. moving > a Transport AD to cover O&M). If the serving member is at the > end of their normal term there is no change in procedures. Otherwise, > this is treated as a mid-term vacancy and mid-term procedures are > used with the following exceptions: > > a) If the vacancy will occur on the IAB due to a move from > the IAB to the IESG, the Nomcom may, upon confirmation of nominee/IAB > member, submit for confirmation as part of the normal slate of > candidates another nominee to complete the term of the departing > IAB member. If the Nomcom declines to nominate a replacement as > part of the annual process, the IAB may, at any time after the > confirmation of the departing member, ask the Nomcom to fill > the slot using mid-term procedures. Is this whole section only intended to apply during the annual process? If so, I think that should be more explicit. If not, then exception (a) should probably indicate that it only applies during the annual process and/or when more than N IAB positions are simultaneously being filled. Otherwise, it is still ambiguous what procedure should be used if an IAB member is moved to the IESG to fill an interim vacancy. I _think_ that the WG intends that the IAB position thus vacated would be filled using the full interim vacancy process... Margaret
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-nomcom Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC