Re: small pending issue

[Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>]

personally speaking,  makes sense to me.

a.

On fredag, dec 19, 2003, at 22:21 Asia/Seoul, James M Galvin wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>     current text:
>
>     The confirmation process must be completed at least one month 
> prior to
>     the first IETF.
>
>     suggested text:
>
>     The completion of the confirmation process is due one month prior 
> to
>     the first IETF.
>
>     Is this change acceptable?
>
>
> I like it.  There are a few places where the phrase "must be completed"
> is used.  Would it make sense to change them all to "is due"?
>
> Jim