Re: UPDATED: WG Action: Conclusion of The Operation of the IESG/IAB Nominating and Recall Committees (nomcom) (fwd)

[James M Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>]

Well, I disagree, but this is not the place to debate the merits of
SPF or any other spam reducing tool.

Jim



On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Jeff Williams wrote:

    Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 00:08:51 -0700
    From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
    To: James M Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>
    Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com
    Subject: Re: UPDATED: WG Action: Conclusion of The Operation of the
        IESG/IAB Nominating and Recall Committees (nomcom) (fwd)

    James and all,

      If the IETF or you would consider implementing Spf correctly, the
    spam would be greatly reduced.


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>