Re: UPDATED: WG Action: Conclusion of The Operation of the IESG/IAB Nominating and Recall Committees (nomcom) (fwd)

[avri@acm.org]

On 4 aug 2004, at 15.03, James M Galvin wrote:

> I am willing to keep the list active or provide a "new" list, if that's
> what folks want to do.  I'm offering so we can see if folks want to
> speak up in favor of it.  So far, I'm not sensing a "consensus" of
> opposition to closing the list, although that's really for the Chair to
> say.

I assume you mean the "General Area AD to say."  The group no longer 
exists and thus no longer has a chair only and ex-chair.  The General 
Area Ad has requested the list be closed and I expect any decision to 
keep it open would be his decision as well.

As an individual who is very interested in NomCom I have no objection 
to there being a list for ongoing discussions and would join such a 
list.  I would even be willing to help administer such a list.

As chair, I had to curtail discussions, because of the charter, of 
radical changes one could have suggested to the IETF process for 
picking its leadership even though I knew there were those who had such 
an interest.  As an individual I think it might be interesting to have 
a space where radical revisions could be discussed by those who desired 
to do so.

a.

PS. As the ex-chair I thank everyone on this list for their 
participation in the WG.  I enjoyed working with all.


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>