Re: nomcom participation criteria

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Rahmat and all,

  Good points here Rahmat.  This document seem more like defining
a "Club" mentality rather than a standards body...  :(

Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:

> > Since the question has come up, perhaps it would be timely to review the
> > rule, for possible revision (for later nomcoms, not this one, of course)?
>
> Well apparently, am I the only one who has been asked to
> post this type of issue to ietf-process?
>
> > I think it ain't broke and doesn't need fixing.
>
> Wrong! First, "broke" should be defined and then "fixing".
>
> >From my point of view, a system that:
>
> - implements double standards
> - with too many aging members
> - does not care/encourage more new participants from
>   other parts of the universe;
>
> is broken by definition. But who care views from the
> other parts of this universe?
>
> regards,
>
> --
> Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim - VLSM-TJT - http://rms46.vlsm.org
> --- Robert T. Kiyosaki is a cruel pathetic Dad! ----------

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208