[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-trade Home]
Subject: RE: Bug in IOTP's DTD
Masaaki I accept that there is a mistake in the IOTP DTD, however this part of the IOTP DTD was copied **directly** from the the IOTP dsig spec at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-dsig-03.txt which contains the same error. The only changes made when copying were the removal of some blank lines and page headers and footers. The reason for copying in the IOTP dsig DTD is to avoid having to use namespaces in IOTP. So really what I think we should do is: 1. Fix the DTD in the IOTP dsig spec (Yoshiaki ?) and then 2. Fix the DTD in the IOTP spec. Regards David -----Original Message----- From: Masaaki Hiroya [mailto:hiroya@sdl.hitachi.co.jp] Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 3:33 AM To: David Burdett Cc: hiroya@sdl.hitachi.co.jp Subject: Bug in IOTP's DTD David There is a bug in ietf.org/draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-protocol-06. > <!ELEMENT Value ( #PCDATA ) > > <!ATTLIST Value > ID ID #IMPLIED > encoding (base64|none) #IMPLIED 'base64' I think #IMPLIED in the "encoding" attribute should be removed. Draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-dsig-03.txt defines the Value element as follows: > <!ELEMENT Value ( #PCDATA ) > > <!ATTLIST Value > ID ID #IMPLIED > encoding (base64|none) 'base64' Please correct the DTD in iotp-v1.0-protocol-06. Masaaki ----- Masaaki Hiroya Systems Development Laboratory Hitachi, Ltd. tel: +81-44-549-1531 fax: +81-44-549-1640 email: hiroya@sdl.hitachi.co.jp
<<application/ms-tnef>>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-trade Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC