Re: IOTPV2: XML messaging

["Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>]

I'd like to know also.  :-) I think ebXML is the most likely candidate
right now.  The working group consensus has consistently been in favor
of picking a messaging protocol specified elsewhere rather than
rolling our own.  Hopefully the timing will work out so that we can
pick what will become the dominant messaging protocol...

Thanks,
Donald

From:  Ko Fujimura <fujimura@isl.ntt.co.jp>
Date:  Fri, 09 Mar 2001 18:02:13 +0900
To:  ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com
Message-id:  <3AA89C15.E6C93878@isl.ntt.co.jp>

>In <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-trade-iotp2-req-00.txt>:
>
>> INTERNET-DRAFT            IOTP v2 Requirements             February 2001
>> 
>> 
>> 1. Introduction
>> 
>>    Verion 2 of the Internet Open Trading Protocol (IOTP) will extend the
>>    interoperable framework for Internet commerce capabilities of Version
>>    1 [RFC 2801] as described in Section 3 below.  In addition, it will
>>    replace the ad hoc XML messaging and digitial signature [RFC 2802]
>>    parts of IOTP v1 with standards based mechanisms.
>
>Which XML messaging protocols will be used for replacing current XML messaging?
>Do you assume that ebXML TR/P for underlying protocol of IOTP version 2?
>I would like to know the direction of the language design. 
>
>Thanks,
>
>Ko Fujimura, NTT