[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-trade Home]
Subject: Re: Comemnt: draft-ietf-trade-ecml2-spec-07.txt
Valid From date seems like a reasonable addition for payment cards given that use of any of these fields is optional. Thanks, Donald ====================================================================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd dee3@torque.pothole.com 155 Beaver Street +1-508-634-2066(h) +1-508-851-8280(w) Milford, MA 01757 USA Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ray Bellis wrote: > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:03:56 +0000 > From: Ray Bellis <rpb@community.net.uk> > To: ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com > Cc: lauri.piikivi@nokia.com > Subject: Re: Comemnt: draft-ietf-trade-ecml2-spec-07.txt > > > Should there be a SWITCH payment card type defined, if > > the card issuer number ECom_Payment_Card_IssueNumber is > > for that card only? > > The issue number also appears on "Solo" cards, although these are much > rarer than Switch cards. > > There's some information about Switch joining the Maestro brand here > (http://www.switch.co.uk/maestro/switch_maestro1.htm). There's actually > some suggestion that as part of this process the issue number will > actually disappear from Switch cards. > > > Does the switch card system operate at all without the > > issue number? I mean that if the customer can not give > > the numebr to merchant in web payment, will the charging > > be made. Or is the switch issue numebr needed only for > > transaction processing, from merchant to processor? > > Our own payment processing software requires the end user to supply > their card's issue number. That issue number is included in the card > authorisation (APACS30) messages sent to UK acquirers. > > On Switch cards that don't have an issue number most UK sites (including > our own) require the supply of the card's "valid from" date instead. > Strangly this "valid from" information doesn't appear to be supported by > APACS30, although I presume there must be some processors' systems > capable of using this information. > > On checking our e-commerce app we do send "valid from" information to > the payment services run by Netgiro, Bibit and Netbanx. I don't know > what they do with the information, but this does seem to suggest that we > need yet more ECML fields. > > May I therefore suggest? > > Ecom_Payment_Card_ValidFrom_Day > Ecom_Payment_Card_ValidFrom_Month > Ecom_Payment_Card_ValidFrom_Year > > Can anyone who knows better suggest whether loyalty cards might also > need "valid from" fields? > > kind regards, > > Ray Bellis > > -- > Ray Bellis, MA(Oxon) - Technical Director > community internet plc - ts.com Ltd > > Windsor House, 12 High Street, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 2PJ > tel: +44 1865 856000 email: ray.bellis@community.net.uk > fax: +44 1865 856001 web: http://www.community.net.uk/ > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [ietf-trade Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC